You are currently browsing the Wedding Wear category

Get Your Garter On

  • June 2, 2010 at 11:08 pm

First off, we are not doing the garter toss or bouquet toss. I originally did not plan on wearing a garter at all, but found myself swooning over a lot of the awesomely designed garters from Florrie Mitton and Julianne Smith. I just couldn’t bring myself to buy a garter when I knew we weren’t partaking in the tossing tradition (of which really bothers me – the tradition, that is).

On a whim I entered a blog contest expecting to not win. Lets be honest, I never win anything. Ever. Not the lottery, nothing on the radio, zilch.

One sunny morning (we can pretend it was sunny, okay?), I got a lovely little surprise announcing that I had one the contest. Score!

So, what did I win?

1

Source

After a crazy situation with the USPS (who happens to not be my friend at the moment), my garter finally arrived from the UK!

2

Pretty packaging!

3

Lovely little box!

4

Final product!

5

All images personal unless otherwise noted.

I could not be more excited about this garter. And, while I won’t be tossing it, I will be excitedly wearing it all day long!

Are you partaking in the garter toss tradition? Or did you “toss” that one out the door?


This article was originally posted onWeddingbee.

Shoe Conundrum: Resolved!

  • June 2, 2010 at 12:30 am

Okay, so I have to be honest with you all. I was astounded by the response I got to my post debating whether or not to wear flip-flops with my wedding dress. As I said then, I am most definitely not a shoe girl—I just really don’t care very much about what’s on my feet—so I was really surprised by how many people weighed in, both pro- and anti-flip-flop!

I think, overall, the prevailing sentiment I got from the comments was, it’s your day! Do what you like!which was nice to hear. However, the passion with which some commenters argued against the flip-flops really got me thinking. On top of that, MOH/Sister Lauren and Mom Octopus both seemed really lukewarm about the flip-flop idea. As in, when I broached the topic to them, they both literally said, “meeehhhhhhh……” So, I decided. Those adorable J. Crew flip-flops? OUT.

(Source)

That meant I had to find a new pair. I started Internet window shoe-shopping in earnest, and here’s what I was looking for:

  1. Flat. Flat flat flat flat. Not even a kitten heel—FLAT. As I’ve already mentioned, Mr. O’s not much taller than me, I am incredibly awkward in heels, and I find them super-uncomfortable. I’m not ABOUT to volunteer myself to be an clumsy giant in pain on my wedding day.
  2. Under $100. I wanted to allocate most of my accessories budget to jewelry, which I love way more than shoes, and which will be much more visible.
  3. Neutral. Every time I see a photo of a bride with colored shoes, I think, ‘how adorable!’ But for some reason, it just wasn’t for me. I was looking for champagne, gold, ivory, or silver.
  4. Easy. I was determined not to over-think or stress out about this. I, like lots of brides, have definitely fallen prey to the tendency to obsess over minor details, and I did not want this to be one of those times. It’s just a pair of shoes. I don’t even care about shoes. So, I reminded myself a bunch of times: as soon as I find something cute that meets the criteria, buy them and don’t look back.

So that’s exactly what I did! After half an hour of cruising Piperlime, I found them: flat, under $100, neutral, cute. So I bought them, and I have no regrets! Here are my wedding shoes, the Steve Madden Florale flat.


(Source)

And here’s how they look on me:

I bought a size 8 (my usual size) and they’re just a little too big, so I’m going to have to return them for a 7.5, which is slightly annoying, but not a big deal in the grand scheme of things.

Want to hear the best part? Piperlime is a division of Gap, and Mom Octopus had a bunch of GapCard reward coupons, which brought the price down from $70 to $29.99. THEN! Mom Octopus remembered that, for some reason, she had accidentally overpaid her GapCard bill by $80 a while ago, and therefore had an $80 credit waiting to be used on her card. So these shoes then went from $29.99 to F-R-E-E FREE, baby!

I’m really glad to have this decision made, and to have a cute, comfy, FREE pair of shoes stashed away so I can freely move on to obsessing over other minor details. Hooray!

What were you looking for in your wedding shoes? Also, I’m not the only bride out there who seriously doesn’t really care what her shoes look like, right? (Anybody?)


This article was originally posted onWeddingbee.

Exorcising My Wedding Dress Demons

  • May 26, 2010 at 1:40 pm

Hey there, hive! I’ve got a story for you. I don’t really know how to address this issue, since it touches on some feelings that I’ve been harboring since oru wedding. I am slowly coming to terms with this a full NINE months AFTER my wedding. What is troubling me so? My dress.

Honestly, I liked my dress. I liked it a lot… but I can’t help but feel that I lost out on some bridal rite of passage by not buying a brand name/designer dress.

By the way, just in case you forgot, here’s my dress, which is also Mrs. Nachos’ dress. Great minds… :)

I usually don’t covet other people’s stuff, especially things on the pricier end of the spectrum, even more so when it comes to clothes. 9 times out of 10 when it comes to clothing shopping, I’ll roll out to H &M, Zara or maybe splurge at Club Monaco (See, not even close to designer!). I usually shock some people who inquire about certain things I wear and get a heap of furrowed brows when I tell them it’s from Old Navy. (Don’t sleep on Old Navy, folks!) Add all of this to the fact that during my planning process, I definitely didn’t get into “I must feel like a bride” or “It must be ’bridal’ or nothing” attitude, so why the heck do I still feel a sense of loss that I never had the pretty designer wedding dress from the fancy bridal store?

I had been thinking about my feelings of “loss” here and there, but the issue didn’t rear its ugly head until one morning when I was futzing around Twitter. I saw a tweet that profoundly disturbed me. The tweet was about Ms. Vera Wang’s decision to sell a line at David’s Bridal. Someone I happen to follow (who I no longer follow, and you’ll know why in a second) pretty much called the move “Barfworthy.” SAY WHAT?! HOLD UP! WAIT A MINUTE!

Look, we are all entitled to our opinions. I also know nothing can start an angry stampede of brides than the mention of the words “David’s Bridal”. But come on… barfworthy? I don’t judge people by what labels they wear in everyday life. I’m not about to start on their wedding day. Maybe this was my own insecurity whispering angry words into my ears, but I really don’t like when people turn their noses up at others for something as small as clothing choices. Perhaps I’m a bit harsh, but I would love to see a happy, ecstatic bride regardless of what the label in her dress says.

The tweeter and I exchanged some tweets. I told her to each her own regarding dress choices, and I disengaged and stopped following her. In the weeks since my little “incident” on Twitter has occurred, I think I’ve made some peace with my dress choice.

My dress did what it needed to do. It made me look great the one day I wanted it make me look and feel fabulous. It’s now sitting in my closet pressed and dry-cleaned waiting for me to get off my behind and do something with it (maybe publishing this post will spur me into action?). I loved my wedding day, but I have no desire to wear my dress again. I actually don’t think about my darling dress very much at all.

So in an effort to finally rid myself of my unnecessary insecurity and unfounded regret, I’ve decided to write a short letter to the Bridal Gown Industry to exorcise my dress demons and finally move on.

May 2010

Dear Bridal Gown Industry,

Unlike many women, I didn’t like my bridal gown shopping experience. It was at times disheartening, frustrating and could sometimes be a pretty big pain in the arse. There are some things I need to tell you, and I feel that by telling you publicly I will rid myself of feeling that I missed out on some quintessential bridal experience.

I would just like to say that my name is Mrs. Swan, and:

  1. I tried on over 60 dresses, and it took me forever to find a dress I liked. Even when I did, I questioned it when as I was buying it. There were no angels singing nor did the heavens part once I found my dress. I did not cry. I just kinda bought the dress. Please don’t tell me there is a “one” dress made for me. There probably could have been tons of others out there, if I was willing to spend more money.
  2. I know that you all strive to be creative and regale us with new designs each season, but how about something else besides strapless dresses? I promise that brides will like a little something different.
  3. Some of us want a dress that is reasonably priced. For some strange reason, Bridal Gown Industry, you have decided that reasonably priced somehow equals beading. Why does there need to be an odd direct correlation between more beading and lower price?
  4. Why don’t many stores let us take pictures? Would it really be that bad? If I want to copy the dress, I’ll just go to the designer’s website. It’s not that crucial. I would have still bought your dress if you let me take a picture to show my family and friends. Finally….
  5. I live in New York City, and I have never been to Kleinfeld’s.

Thank you, for letting me tell you those things, Bridal Gown Industry. I am now going to finish my newlywed days being at peace with my dress choice.

May I never have to shop for a wedding dress ever again,

Mrs. Swan


This article was originally posted onWeddingbee.

Champagne Wish [Sparkle & Swish]

  • May 13, 2010 at 12:49 am

Like most brides, I started looking at dress pictures as soon as I got engaged. I had no idea what our wedding would be like, but whenever I saw a dress I couldn’t stop thinking about, I figured it meant that there was something about it that spoke to me, and I saved it.

Originally, I’d denied the excitement these dresses held for me, but after I got that self-image stuff out of the way, I decided to look at them again and see if any of them had jumped into my subconscious.

Alvina+

Alvina Valenta, 9914 – What a romantic dress. Look at that color! And the lace! And the box pleats!

amsale+

Amsale, “Ella” – The natural waist, tiny pleats, and lace bodice make this dress look so sweet.

melissa

Melissa Sweet, “Saffron” – I love the sexy sparkly-ness. Also, the veil.

renella

Renella di Fina, “Lauren” – I love the deconstructed elegance of this. I just want to go running in a field with it. Also, the taffeta.

leeanbe

I love the glow of a beautiful hand-made dupioni gown, like this one by Lea Ann Belter.

Can you find the common elements in these dresses? When I went back to my original favorite dresses, I kept thinking about what I truly wanted. I realized that I wanted a lot of fabric to swish around in, and I wanted to sparkle. So here is my “sparkle & swish” dress.

Michell Michell01

It’s a natural-waist, strapless very full A-line, with an inexact hem. It will have a sparkly bodice; the perfect showcase for the beaded lace my grandmother bought me. The sweetheart neckline will have the matching trim we picked out that day. The shape is a full a-line; the waist comes to a V in the back and the skirt will have box pleats. I have not yet decided what to do with the waistline (ruched? organza? a sash?) but we’ll see.

In the sketch, the dress looks a bit plain. But there’s one more surprise. Here’s a shot of the dress fabric underneath the beaded lace:

DSC_110

I hadn’t expected to find this, but came across it by accident. I initially chose the ivory silk satin for my dress, but, seeing as that was never what I truly wanted, I set about looking for the perfect dupioni and saw this one in the back of Richard Brooks fabrics. I couldn’t stop staring at it — and you know what that means. Depending on your monitor, the sunlight, or the lighting in the room, this shimmery shantung can appear off-white, gold, or pink (pink!). The fabric’s official name is “Champagne”.

Even though I loved the Alvina Valenta, I didn’t plan on wearing a non-white/ivory dress. I can’t deny, though, that my admiration for that dress got me comfortable with the idea. Plus, the contrast of the “champagne” with the ivory beads shows them off beautifully.

I hear many brides say they tried on something and “just knew”, but I wonder how much of that is just an affirmation of an idea or thought we might have had a long time ago?

Did any of your initial ideas from your earliest days of being engaged make it into your final choice?


This article was originally posted onWeddingbee.

A Two-Dress Affair: Let’s Set the Record Straight!

  • May 12, 2010 at 9:10 pm

Once a long time ago I think I mentioned that we’re both wearing dresses for our ceremony. F Stripes, however, is convinced that you all think she’s wearing a suit so she wanted me to set the record straight (hee hee) and treat you to a sneak peEk of our two-dress affair. I am still waffling on my dress but I do LOVE how we look together! Just try to ignore our pointy feet mkay?!

1


And here’s a few more of the beautiful F Stripes:

2

3

And a couple more of my dress, too:

4

5

A great post by Raven over on So You’re Engayged really made me stop and think about the social/cultural/whatever-the-eff ramifications of both wearing dresses to our wedding. And I LOVE IT. I love that we’re both wearing dresses, and here’s why—it’s secretly subversive. How’s that, you say? Even more subversive than two-girls getting hitched in a state that voted against our right to wed?

Raven put it more eloquently than I ever could, saying, “I hadn’t seen many pictures of two brides both in dresses. But every time I do… well, I know it sounds cheesy, but my heart skips a beat. Maybe there’s something about the undeniable homosexuality of that image. There’s no chance of mistaking one of the brides for a man, even momentarily.”

And that, my lovelies is why I LOVE that our two-bride wedding is a two-dress affair! Make no mistake our wedding is a seriously gay affair. A no-joke, bad-ass, two girls in white mini-dresses getting hitched and making out in public affair.

The whole notion that one half of a gay couple has to “be the man” or “be the woman” is such a heteronormative stereotype, not to mention often untrue. AND nothing says take a look, we’re both girls, and we’re getting married to EACH OTHER like two white dresses. So take a good look. And let me know what you think of the dresses! :)

Are you waffling on your dress decision, or making any statements with your wedding attire?


This article was originally posted onWeddingbee.

Wedding Dresses from the Vineyard Collection

  • April 22, 2010 at 5:00 pm

Continuing with all things fashion week, we have a sneak-peek of the Vineyard Collection from the powerhouse of bridal ware, Priscilla of Boston. This line is known for classic, clean shapes and perfectly tailored dresses with a flirty side. As always, kudos to Matthew and Enna Grazier who captured these frocks to perfection.

Vineyard Collection

Vineyard Collection

Vineyard Collection

Vineyard Collection

Vineyard Collection

You know what my most favorite part of this line is? The pockets! So genius. You can find more from the Vineyard runway show in our gallery. Happy perusing.

Grazier Photography is a member of our Little Black Book. For more information on how members are chosen, click here.

© Style Me Pretty : The Ultimate Wedding Blog, 2010. |
Permalink |
Comments |

Post tags: Bridal Fashion, Matthew Grazier, Runway, Vineyard Collection
Post categories: Style Picks, The Blog, Wedding Dresses, Wedding Fashion, Wedding Style


This article was originally posted onStyle Me Pretty.

Wedding Headpieces by Twigs & Honey

  • April 21, 2010 at 5:00 pm

What fashion week would be complete without the genius creations of Myra Callan, the mastermind behind Twigs & Honey? She is a purveyor of all things feathery and girly and I literally die over every single one of her pieces. Lucky for us, she has just joined the ranks of other fab designers in Style Me Pretty’s Look Book so you can peruse and shop her collection to your little heart’s content.

Twigs & Honey

Twigs & Honey

Twigs & Honey

Twigs & Honey

Twigs & Honey

If you are looking for that perfect finishing touch for your wedding day or you just feel like rocking some fabulous head gear, be sure to check out The Twigs & Honey collection in the Look Book because this, my dears, is just the tip of the iceberg.

Twigs & Honey is a member of our Look Book. For more information on how members are chosen, click here.

© Style Me Pretty : The Ultimate Wedding Blog, 2010. |
Permalink |
Comments |

Post tags: Look Book, Myra Callan, Twigs & Honey
Post categories: Accessories, Style Picks, The Blog, Wedding Fashion


This article was originally posted onStyle Me Pretty.

To Top It All Off

  • April 20, 2010 at 11:25 pm

I’m planning on carrying on the 1980s tradition of wearing a ginormous wedding hat. Check out this sweet masterpiece of lace and tulle I picked up:

Photobucket

JUUUUST KIDDING!! (I do like to play dress up in antique stores though, in case you’re wondering.)

But seriously now, this is my veil:

Photobucket

It doesn’t have much of a story to go along with it. The only type of veil I’ve ever considered wearing is a birdcage veil. I feel like it fits me. This is the first one I tried on. It’s called “Natasha” and the designer is Jennifer Leigh. It has tiny rhinestones and pearls on it. I immediately loved it. The end.

So, what do you think? Should I have stuck with the lace hat? ;) Who else is all about jumping on the birdcage bandwagon?


This article was originally posted onWeddingbee.

Headpieces by Ban.do

  • April 20, 2010 at 3:15 pm

And while we’re gushing about all things fashion, we HAD to share the latest collection from the beloved design studio ban.do. It’s purely fabulous in that Audrey Hepburn meets Sex in the City kind of way. From perfect birdcage veils to the most gorgeous headbands a girl could ever want, I’ve fallen hard for each and every one of them! Click here to see the full gallery.

wedding headpieces

wedding headpieces

wedding headpieces

wedding head

headpieces by bando

My very favorite piece is without a doubt, the center oval headband. It’s flawless. To see even more from the latest ban.do collection, click right here! Coming up next…a fashion inspired wedding that is all about the swoon. It’s swoon city.

© Style Me Pretty : The Ultimate Wedding Blog, 2010. |
Permalink |
4 comments |

Post tags: Ban.do, Headbands, Headpieces, Veils
Post categories: Accessories, Wedding Fashion


This article was originally posted onStyle Me Pretty.

Wedding Dresses by Carolina Herrera

  • April 19, 2010 at 9:21 pm

Carolina Herrera is the go to designer for all things elegant and chic and her new bridal collection is no exception. The head gear was out to play and the dresses, oh the dresses. There were definitely a few show stoppers in the mix. From florals to ruffles, Carolina has you covered. Matthew Grazier was there to capture all of the gorgeous details, front, back and everywhere in between. Be sure to view the gallery for the full fabulous collection.

Carolina Herrera

Carolina Herrera

Carolina Herrera

Carolina Herrera

Carolina Herrera

That last dress is killing me with its gorgeousness. Thanks Matthew for all the runway eye candy! Be sure to check out the gallery for Carolina Herrera’s full bridal collection.

Grazier Photography is a member of our Little Black Book. For more information on how members are chosen, click here.

© Style Me Pretty : The Ultimate Wedding Blog, 2010. |
Permalink |
3 comments |

Post tags: Carolina Herrera, Matthew Grazier
Post categories: Style Picks, The Blog, Wedding Dresses, Wedding Fashion, Wedding Style


This article was originally posted onStyle Me Pretty.